Anyone who’s passionate about science, as I am, cannot help but be seriously concerned by the growing extent to which anti-scientific ideas, and the groups and organisations that promote them, are increasingly creeping into public life and attracting mainstream political support. While it’s easy to ridicule the purveyors of anti-scientific ideas when they’re to be found
submitted by
LiberalConspiracy on 23rd Jul 2009 (via liberalconspiracy.org)
this is a guest post by Yasmin Khan In a recent blog entry I alluded to the prospect of utilizing science diplomacy to help promote world peace. Following President Barack Obama’s ground-breaking speech in Cairo, it now seems that dormant rhetoric will soon be put into imminent action. Intentions to support scientific initiatives in the Islamic
submitted by
PickledPolitics on 15th Jun 2009 (via pickledpolitics.com)
An interesting study for those who (as I am) are interested in the reasons why people hold different political views has been published in the latest issue of Science. People who react more strongly to bumps in the night, spiders on a human body or the sight of a shell-shocked victim are more likely to support public policies that emphasize protecting society over preserving individual privacy. - ...
submitted by
QuestionThat on 18th Sep 2008 (via questionthat.me.uk)
It is their doom-laden political outlook that really convinces greens the world is ending, not scientific evidence.
submitted by
Spiked on 8th Apr 2010 (via spiked-online.com)
Science has been 'reduced to a political bargaining chip' says a report calling for extensive Whitehall reforms to put independent scientific advice at the heart of government
submitted by
FT on 23rd Jul 2009 (via traxfer.ft.com)
The use of the English libel laws to silence critical discussion of medical practice and scientific evidence discourages debate, denies the public access to the full picture and encourages use of the courts to silence critics. The British Chiropractic Association has sued Simon Singh for libel. The scientific community would have preferred that it had
submitted by
NickCohen on 4th Jun 2009 (via nickcohen.net)
Liberal Conspiracy has a good article up from Unity in response to the Schools Minister Sarah McCarthy-Fry's comments on the lack of schoolgirls opting to study sciences. He points out that science is science and that there really is no such thing as the 'girl-friendly' science that the Minister would like schools to teach. The scientific method is important and that requires a certain degree of r...
submitted by
MyPoliticalBlog on 27th Nov 2008 (via vinospoliticalblog.blogspot.com)
Surely not? He doesn't know any recent science. His doctorate must be nearly forty years old, and that constitutes the sum total of his specifically scientific efforts. In the meantime, he has just churned out the same book and set of articles over and over again. They are not about science, and they are incompetent in their field. A friend of mine who was lectured by Dawkins at Oxford a decade ag...
submitted by
DavidLindsay on 18th Aug 2008 (via davidaslindsay.blogspot.com)
Tags:
Barack Obama has announced that physicist John Holdren and marine biologist Jane Lubchenco will take up two of the top scientific posts under his administration. John Holdren will be Executive Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy and the president’s science adviser. Jane Lubchenco will be in charge at the National Oceanic
submitted by
LiberalDemocratVoice on 20th Dec 2008 (via libdemvoice.org)
Government science and innovation investment received a major boost yesterday with the announcement of a joint venture that will see the Harwell Science and Innovation Campus develop into one of the worlds principal locations for scientific, academic and business collaboration.
submitted by
PublicTechnology on 15th Aug 2008 (via publictechnology.net)
Tags:
In an important paper published on Ecoworld, Robert Lindzen, Professor of Atmospheric Science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, takes stock of scientific misconduct with regard to climate hysteria: Climate Science: Is It Currently Designed To Answer Questions? [W]hat historians will definitely wonder about in future centuries is how deeply flawed logic, obscured by shrewd and unrelenti...
submitted by
KleinVerzet on 7th Nov 2008 (via kleinverzet.blogspot.com)
Tags: