Following a barage of criticism over amendments to the Digital Economy Bill, the backers of the amendment are to make concessions which, they hope, will answer many of the objections. As the FT reports [free registration may be required to view article]: The Liberal Democrats will publish changes on Friday to their original amendment, of which
submitted by
LiberalDemocratVoice on 12th Mar 2010 (via libdemvoice.org)
The Digital Economy Bill has become one of the most heavily debated topics on this site. Posts related to it often generate a large number of comments, but today’s have done far more than that. A bit of background first for anyone new to the story or catching up on it. The Digital Economy Bill has
submitted by
LiberalDemocratVoice on 4th Mar 2010 (via libdemvoice.org)
The Liberal Democrats have now withdrawn their support for the Digital Economy Bill, in a revision of the original plan to vote against certain elements in the “washup” (the last-minute rush to pass laws without debate or detailed scrutiny at the end of a Parliament). Paul Burstow, Liberal Democrat Chief Whip announced on Twitter earlier
submitted by
LiberalDemocratVoice on 31st Mar 2010 (via libdemvoice.org)
Last week we reported that, following the concessions forced on the government, Don Foster MP is broadly happy with the Digital Economy Bill’s proposals on illicit downloads. Jim Killock of the The Open Rights Group has a different take on the situation: The Digital Economy Bill should be opposed by Liberal Democrats. Mandelson’s Bill seeks to reduce illicit
submitted by
LiberalDemocratVoice on 10th Feb 2010 (via libdemvoice.org)
The net is all a-Twitter with frustration and despair over Lib-Dem and Tory amendment 120a to the Digital Economy Bill. Why are we wasting our energies on this action while there are still much, MUCH greater threats to our rights and freedoms still inside the bill's content?
submitted by
LiberalConspiracy on 4th Mar 2010 (via liberalconspiracy.org)
Over at The Guardian’s Comment Is Free website, Lib Dem blogger James Graham argues that it was the UK’s broken Parliament – an antiquated Lords, a whipped Commons – which got us into the legislative mess of Labour’s Digital Economy Bill. The only way to fix it, says James, is to vote for a new
submitted by
LiberalDemocratVoice on 8th Apr 2010 (via libdemvoice.org)
Responding to todays publication of Lord Carters report into the future of the digital economy, the The Interim Digital Britain Report, Liberal Democrat Shadow Culture, Media and Sport Secretary, Don Foster said:
submitted by
PublicTechnology on 30th Jan 2009 (via publictechnology.net)
Jim Killock, Executive Director of the Open Rights Group, writes about the Digital Economy Bill: The Open Rights Group would like to thank the Lib Dems for taking a strong policy stance against the Digital Economy Bill’s disconnection and web blocking proposals. The biggest danger now is that Parliament will not debate or amend the Bill at
submitted by
LiberalDemocratVoice on 17th Mar 2010 (via libdemvoice.org)
The Digital Economy Bill, currently at the report stage in the Lords has caused concern, as Lib Dem peers Lord Razzall and Lord Clement-Jones are seeking an amendment to allow site blocking for copyright infringement. Earlier this week, Open Rights Group posted an appeal for people to write to the peers, asking them to drop the
submitted by
LiberalDemocratVoice on 3rd Mar 2010 (via libdemvoice.org)
Although Labour, with Conservative support, managed to ram through the Digital Economy Bill, that’s not quite the end of the matter as far as votes in Parliament are concerned. That’s because one concession the Liberal Democrats did manage to extract was the provision that no ‘technical measures’ (i.e. cutting off people’s internet connections) can be introduced
submitted by
LiberalDemocratVoice on 10th Apr 2010 (via libdemvoice.org)