Richard Grayson (former head of policy for the party and one of the leading lights behind the Social Liberal Forum) has written a thoughtful pamphlet for Compass about the different strains of thought within the Liberal Democrats and what they mean for coalition government. The subtlety of some of Richard’s views mean you have to
submitted by
LiberalDemocratVoice on 12th Jul 2010 (via libdemvoice.org)
Much of the debate on the deal between the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats to form a coalition government has focused on how "strange" it was for the two parties to enter a partnership. In The Liberal Democrat Journey, published by Compass, Dr Richard Grayson details the transformation of the Liberal Democrats over the past decade and shows why the coalition is not all that alien.
submitted by
LiberalConspiracy on 9th Jul 2010 (via liberalconspiracy.org)
The party has this morning issued the following briefing note on the achievements of the Lib Dems within the Coalition Government … In just 10 weeks since the start of the Coalition Government, the Liberal Democrats have exerted a huge influence over its agenda. Going into the election the Liberal Democrats made clear that they
submitted by
LiberalDemocratVoice on 21st Jul 2010 (via libdemvoice.org)
In the Guardian last week, Timothy Garton-Ash argued that the Liberal Democrats’ distinctive identity is being lost both by coalition with the Conservatives and by other parties’ appropriation of the “liberal” label: The Liberal Democrats should change their name to the Liberals. Here’s why. First of all, Liberal Democrats is a pretty meaningless name. That’s
submitted by
LiberalDemocratVoice on 4th Jul 2010 (via libdemvoice.org)
I notice that Jackie Ashley has been calling for a coalition in the Guardian yesterday, in echos of Marquand. The Liberal Democrats are a party with no social obligations (or indeed philosophical ones, it so often seems), and as such, at least under First Past the Post, there should be no coalition, even if that means we have to lose. That said, I still think that they're a lot better than To...
submitted by
NewDirection on 2nd Jun 2009 (via newerlabour.blogspot.com)
The Liberal Democrats have clearly taken an electoral hit as a result of their decision to enter into a coalition with the Conservatives, writes John Curtice.
submitted by
Telegraph on 15th May 2010 (via telegraph.co.uk)
For years the Liberal Party, which became the Liberal Democrats, hankered for coalition government. This was perfectly sensible. There was no way they were going to be the maj
submitted by
Scotsman on 8th Dec 2010 (via news.scotsman.com)
Labour ministers have been making overtures to the Liberal Democrats about a possible coalition in an apparent bid to cling to power.
submitted by
Telegraph on 7th May 2010 (via telegraph.co.uk)
The approach that the Liberal Democrats take to social care over the next few weeks and months will be the best guide we have to how they now view the future of the coalition. If, in the coming all party talks, they effectively ally with Labour and try to score points off the Tories by suggesting that their coalition partners are ‘too mean’ to fund a solution to the problem then it wil...
submitted by
Spectator on 4th Jul 2011 (via spectator.co.uk)
As a visitor to LibDemVoice you may or may not be aware of the work of Compass - the influential pressure group that campaigns for a more democratic, equal and sustainable world. Compass is about building a broadly based Liberal Left politics and as a Liberal Democrat activist we wanted to introduce you to our
submitted by
LiberalDemocratVoice on 2nd Jun 2009 (via libdemvoice.org)