So, the Koch brothers fund various people because as rich men they spend their money trying to make the world a better place as they see it. It might not be a better world as you see it, that’s for sure, but they are spending their money as they think it will. The money comes from
submitted by
TimWorstall on 31st Aug 2010 (via timworstall.com)
A trillion here, a trillion there: pretty soon you're talking real money. The BBC is exulting in $1.1 trillion being "pumped into the world economy". Butwhere the dickens do they suppose it is being taken from in the first place, if not "the world economy"? And where is it all going? Partly, in development aid: an expensive way of transferring money from poor people in rich countries to...
submitted by
DanielHannan on 2nd Apr 2009 (via blogs.telegraph.co.uk)
In the old days, the conspicuously rich owned big houses full of works of art where they invited guests to show off their wealth. But now, if you want the world to know that you are dripping money, you buy a yacht.
submitted by
TheIndependent on 24th Oct 2008 (via rss.feedsportal.com)
Tags:
One standard conservative argument is that the wealthy are rich because they invest their money. The poor are that way because they spend their money. The answer is thus to decrease taxes on the rich to stimulate the economy and increase employment. Thirty years of trying have shown this not to work. The problem is that the conclusion does not follow from the premise. If we take the logical approa...
submitted by
Bearwatch on 27th May 2011 (via theylaughedatnoah.blogspot.com)
It's not an investment. It's a place to hang your hat. It's a place to keep your books. It's a place to keep your clothes. It's a place to eat. It's a place to sleep. It's a place to make love. It's a place to have fun. It's a place to be happy. It's a place to be sad. It is not an investment. Or as Charlie Brooker puts it:For years, money was just...
submitted by
ACloudInTrousers on 18th Oct 2008 (via cloud-in-trousers.blogspot.com)
Tags:
They could scarcely deny they had money; indeed they spoke of the pleasures that high incomes bought. "I do enjoy the fact I can have nice holidays and don't think twice about buying particular items," said one lawyer. But most blocked out the suggestion they were extremely well off. Living in London cost a lot, they said: the city that made them rich was a reason you had to be rich. You had ...
submitted by
LeninsTomb on 5th Aug 2008 (via leninology.blogspot.com)
First published on The Broad Oak Blog (Oct. 9, 2010): ________________________________ The vitally important inflation / deflation debate continues. In my last post, I relayed one view, which is that the very rich and powerful will not permit runaway inflation, because it erodes the value of money and the rich have most of the money. As a corrective, I give below the latest video from the National...
submitted by
Bearwatch on 18th Nov 2010 (via theylaughedatnoah.blogspot.com)
Good stuff. Hat tip Moonbattery. We here have always sais that green-nazism was, is and for ever will be a toy-belief-system of rich socialists, who have nothing better to think about. How socialists got rich in the first place, or whether they got to be socialists via some sort of accident after becoming rich, is the subject of
submitted by
LibertarianAlliance on 29th Jul 2008 (via libertarianalliance.wordpress.com)