Holocaust denying and revisionism of the Holocaust is illegal in Germany and Austria. It carries quite a tough penalty and as can be seen from this article here, people can be extradited to face the charges. Gerald Toben, the man under arrest, has been banged up before for expounding his views on the holocaust, which he
submitted by
BoatangAndDemetriou on 2nd Oct 2008 (via boatangdemetriou.wordpress.com)
The notion that we have free speech in Western democracies is fast becoming a fallacy. Free speech is something that our politicians love to tout and showpiece, yet when you really get down to it, when free speech suddenly jumps out of the box and takes on new dimensions, the first thing our leaders do
submitted by
BoatangAndDemetriou on 7th Dec 2008 (via boatangdemetriou.wordpress.com)
No, really, censorship of the internet really isn’t a free speech issue. The Culture Secretary says so. “There is content that should just not be available to be viewed. That is my view. Absolutely categorical. This is not a campaign against free speech, far from it; it is simply there
submitted by
TimWorstall on 27th Dec 2008 (via timworstall.com)
A US Supreme Court ruling rightly argues that all speech should be free, not just speech that is ‘socially beneficial’.
submitted by
Spiked on 22nd Apr 2010 (via spiked-online.com)
Some time ago I posted about freedom of speech. I have just read this article on the UKIP website by Gerard Batten, MEP for London which goes into more detail about the dangers of the European Arrest Warrant.
submitted by
GreggBeamansBlog on 22nd Oct 2008 (via greggbeaman.blogspot.com)
I see that Irish President Mary McAleese has been indluging her hobby of historical revisionism again, this time claiming that tens of thousands of Irishmen joined the British Army in an attempt to avoid poverty rather than out of a sense of partiotism. I'm with Lord Maginnis on this when he wrily observes.... "The whole idea that men joined the Army to keep their families off the bread line ...
submitted by
ATangledWeb on 5th Jan 2009 (via atangledweb.squarespace.com)
It is worth returning to Channel 4’s decision to have President Ahmadinejad deliver its alternative Christmas message. Predictably, those who have attacked the decision have been accused of opposition to free speech—just look at some of the comments on the Skimmer’s post. But this criticism misses a crucial distinction: there is a difference between allowing free speech and provi...
submitted by
Spectator on 27th Dec 2008 (via spectator.co.uk)