The controversy surrounding last year's Great Global Warming Swindle highlights a number of things for me. First of all, the OfCom ruling today appears to have caused more heat than light. The report states that: …In dealing with these complaints therefore Ofcom had to ascertain - not whether the programme was accurate - but whether it
submitted by
QuaequamBlog on 21st Jul 2008 (via theliberati.net)
The ever wise (and droll) Philip Stott says it all here about the eye-opening media spinning of the Ofcom ruling on the Channel Four documentary, The Great Global Warming Swindle. As Philip notes, the only thing that matters is that Ofcom ruled the programme did ‘not materially mislead viewers so as to cause harm or offence' in claiming that man-made global warming was the biggest scam of mo...
submitted by
CliveDavis on 22nd Jul 2008 (via spectator.co.uk)
A controversial Channel 4 film on global warming broke Ofcom rules, the media regulator said this week. The Great Global Warming Swindle was described in one place simply as ‘propaganda'.
submitted by
LiberalConspiracy on 22nd Jul 2008 (via liberalconspiracy.org)
Ofcom, the U.K. television regulator, has rendered a remarkable decision. People interested in what was actually decided will, unfortunately, have to consult the original judgment at Ofcom, rather than the BBC accounts (here, here) of the judgment. BBC stated: The Great Global Warming Swindle, a controversial Channel 4 film, broke Ofcom rules, the media regulator says. In
submitted by
ClimateAudit on 22nd Jul 2008 (via climateaudit.org)
OFCOM has ruled that Channel 4 failed in its duty to be impartial and reflect a range of views when it broadcast the Great Global Warming Swindle, a documentary that set out to expose the lies around man made global warming. But, strangely, Al Gore's climate change propaganda, An Inconvenient Truth, can be shown in schools as long
submitted by
WonkosWorld on 21st Jul 2008 (via wonkosworld.co.uk)
Ofcom is about to release its report into complaints made against Channel 4 regarding its film broadcast last year about the great global warming swindle. Channel 4 misrepresented some of the world's leading climate scientists in a controversial documentary that claimed global warming was a conspiracy and a fraud, the UK's media regulator will rule next
submitted by
Longrider on 19th Jul 2008 (via longrider.co.uk)
Ofcom must be getting fed up with television discussions and polemics about climate change. First it was Channel 4's 'Great Global Warming Swindle' that was found to have misrepresented some scientists, although crucially Ofcom determined that the content did not mislead the public. Now the BBC faces investigation for its 'Earth: The Climate Wars' programme. Lord Monckton, a sceptic of man-made
submitted by
CllrTonySharp on 26th Sep 2008 (via tonysharp.blogspot.com)
The makers of the Great Global Warming Swindle have been given a slap on the wrist by the broadcasting watchdog, Ofcom (who makes up these stupid names). Apparently the ticking off was not because the programme misled viewers in any way, but it did, so Ofcom claim, break Channel 4's own rules on "impartiality".A couple of things about this decision intrigue me. First of all, why would anyone think...
submitted by
Ranting Stan on 22nd Jul 2008 (via rantingstan.blogspot.com)
OFCOM has ruled that Channel 4 failed in its duty to be impartial and reflect a range of views when it broadcast the Great Global Warming Swindle, a documentary that set out to expose the lies around man made global warming. But, strangely, Al Gore’s climate change propaganda, An Inconvenient Truth, can be shown in schools as long as the teacher tells the children that it doesn’t repre...
submitted by
PJCJournal on 4th Aug 2008 (via thejournal.parker-joseph.co.uk)
The latest thing is that global warming will poison us all. Global warming is increasingly affecting the quality of the air that everyone is breathing. She then goes on to talk about low level ozone and particularates. Erm, no, these are nothing to do with global warming. Nothing at all. Sure, they can be produced by the burning of
submitted by
TimWorstall on 21st Aug 2008 (via feeds.feedburner.com)
There is clearly an appetite on this site for reasoned analysis of global warming theory and the policies that flow from it. There are now several different camps of sceptics setting out their thoughts: 1. Global warming deniers. This group argues from recent temperature data that
submitted by
JohnRedwood on 29th Nov 2009 (via johnredwoodsdiary.com)